Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Image/source check requests

    [edit]

    FAC mentoring: first-time nominators

    [edit]

    A voluntary mentoring scheme, designed to help first-time FAC nominators through the process and to improve their chances of a successful outcome, is now in action. Click here for further details. Experienced FAC editors, with five or more "stars" behind them, are invited to consider adding their names to the list of possible mentors, also found in the link. Brianboulton (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    FAC source reviews

    [edit]

    For advice on conducting source reviews, see Wikipedia:Guidance on source reviewing at FAC.

    FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for November 2024

    [edit]

    Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for November 2024. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The new facstats tool has been updated with this data, but the old facstats tool has not. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC) [reply]

    Reviewers for November 2024
    # reviews Type of review
    Reviewer Content Source Image Accessibility
    Nikkimaria 3 1 17
    SchroCat 14 6
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 7 3
    Crisco 1492 9
    Generalissima 5 1 2
    Matarisvan 6 1 1
    Hog Farm 6 1
    Aoba47 3 2
    Dudley Miles 5
    UndercoverClassicist 5
    750h+ 4
    Gog the Mild 4
    Boneless Pizza! 3
    Borsoka 3
    Ceoil 3
    Gerda Arendt 3
    Graham Beards 3
    Hurricanehink 3
    Premeditated Chaos 1 2
    TheJoebro64 3
    Tim riley 3
    AirshipJungleman29 2
    ChrisTheDude 2
    Cukie Gherkin 1 1
    Draken Bowser 2
    Epicgenius 2
    Heartfox 2
    Jens Lallensack 2
    MaranoFan 2
    Medxvo 1 1
    PARAKANYAA 2
    Phlsph7 2
    Piotrus 2
    Vacant0 2
    Ajpolino 1
    Balon Greyjoy 1
    Biruitorul 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1
    Choliamb 1
    Czar 1
    Dugan Murphy 1
    Eddie891 1
    Eem dik doun in toene 1
    Fifelfoo 1
    Gen. Quon 1
    HAL333 1
    Hawkeye7 1
    IntentionallyDense 1
    Ippantekina 1
    JennyOz 1
    Joeyquism 1
    Johnbod 1
    Jonesey95 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1
    Lankyant 1
    Lazman321 1
    LittleLazyLass 1
    Mike Christie 1
    Mrfoogles 1
    Mujinga 1
    NegativeMP1 1
    Nick-D 1
    Paleface Jack 1
    Panini! 1
    Relativity 1
    RFNirmala 1
    Rjjiii 1
    Sammi Brie 1
    Shapeyness 1
    Shushugah 1
    SnowFire 1
    Srnec 1
    The Rambling Man 1
    Thelifeofan413 1
    Thuiop 1
    Tintor2 1
    TompaDompa 1
    Volcanoguy 1
    Wehwalt 1
    WikiOriginal-9 1
    Wtfiv 1
    Zmbro 1
    Zzzs 1
    Totals 155 26 27
    Supports and opposes for November 2024
    # declarations Declaration
    Editor Support Oppose converted to support Struck oppose Struck support Oppose None Total
    Nikkimaria 3 18 21
    SchroCat 8 4 8 20
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 10 10
    Crisco 1492 9 9
    Generalissima 3 2 3 8
    Matarisvan 5 3 8
    Hog Farm 5 1 1 7
    Aoba47 2 3 5
    UndercoverClassicist 4 1 5
    Dudley Miles 3 2 5
    750h+ 4 4
    Gog the Mild 2 1 1 4
    Tim riley 3 3
    Premeditated Chaos 1 2 3
    Gerda Arendt 2 1 3
    Hurricanehink 3 3
    Borsoka 3 3
    Graham Beards 3 3
    Boneless Pizza! 2 1 3
    TheJoebro64 2 1 3
    Ceoil 2 1 3
    Vacant0 2 2
    PARAKANYAA 2 2
    Draken Bowser 1 1 2
    Piotrus 1 1 2
    ChrisTheDude 2 2
    Heartfox 1 1 2
    MaranoFan 1 1 2
    AirshipJungleman29 1 1 2
    Phlsph7 2 2
    Epicgenius 2 2
    Jens Lallensack 2 2
    Cukie Gherkin 2 2
    Medxvo 1 1 2
    Lankyant 1 1
    IntentionallyDense 1 1
    Balon Greyjoy 1 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1 1
    Ajpolino 1 1
    The Rambling Man 1 1
    Shapeyness 1 1
    Nick-D 1 1
    Paleface Jack 1 1
    Gen. Quon 1 1
    Joeyquism 1 1
    LittleLazyLass 1 1
    Jonesey95 1 1
    Zzzs 1 1
    Thelifeofan413 1 1
    JennyOz 1 1
    Srnec 1 1
    SnowFire 1 1
    Choliamb 1 1
    Lazman321 1 1
    WikiOriginal-9 1 1
    Mike Christie 1 1
    Hawkeye7 1 1
    Wtfiv 1 1
    Eem dik doun in toene 1 1
    Thuiop 1 1
    Fifelfoo 1 1
    NegativeMP1 1 1
    Dugan Murphy 1 1
    Wehwalt 1 1
    Mrfoogles 1 1
    Czar 1 1
    Rjjiii 1 1
    Volcanoguy 1 1
    RFNirmala 1 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1 1
    TompaDompa 1 1
    Johnbod 1 1
    Panini! 1 1
    Sammi Brie 1 1
    Zmbro 1 1
    Relativity 1 1
    Tintor2 1 1
    Biruitorul 1 1
    Eddie891 1 1
    Shushugah 1 1
    Mujinga 1 1
    HAL333 1 1
    Ippantekina 1 1
    Totals 105 1 1 16 85 208

    The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC) [reply]

    Nominators for September 2024 to November 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months
    Nominations (12 mos) Reviews (12 mos) Ratio (12 mos)
    750h+ 6.0 51.0 8.5
    AirshipJungleman29 7.0 39.0 5.6
    Amir Ghandi 2.0 None 0.0
    Boneless Pizza! 2.5 8.0 3.2
    ChrisTheDude 9.0 66.0 7.3
    Darkwarriorblake 6.0 3.0 0.5
    Dudley Miles 6.0 33.0 5.5
    Dugan Murphy 3.0 14.0 4.7
    Dxneo 2.0 None 0.0
    Eem dik doun in toene 3.0 10.0 3.3
    Epicgenius 8.5 17.0 2.0
    FunkMonk 2.8 27.0 9.5
    Generalissima 9.0 61.0 6.8
    Hawkeye7 5.0 7.0 1.4
    Hog Farm 7.0 49.0 7.0
    Hurricanehink 2.5 19.0 7.6
    Ippantekina 5.0 6.0 1.2
    Jens Lallensack 3.3 28.0 8.4
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 6.0 218.0 36.3
    Joeyquism 3.0 17.0 5.7
    Kurzon 3.0 None 0.0
    Kyle Peake 4.0 None 0.0
    Llewee 2.0 7.0 3.5
    M4V3R1CK32 2.0 None 0.0
    MaranoFan 5.0 14.0 2.8
    Mike Christie 6.0 54.0 9.0
    NegativeMP1 3.0 11.0 3.7
    Nick-D 2.0 15.0 7.5
    Noorullah21 4.0 None 0.0
    Paleface Jack 3.0 3.0 1.0
    Peacemaker67 6.0 2.0 0.3
    Phlsph7 5.0 16.0 3.2
    Pollosito 2.0 None 0.0
    Premeditated Chaos 8.3 35.0 4.2
    Relayed 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Sammi Brie 3.0 12.0 4.0
    SchroCat 15.0 155.0 10.3
    Serial Number 54129 3.0 39.0 13.0
    The ed17 2.0 1.0 0.5
    The Green Star Collector 3.0 None 0.0
    Thebiguglyalien 5.0 3.0 0.6
    Tim riley 5.0 52.0 10.4
    TrademarkedTWOrantula 3.0 2.0 0.7
    Turini2 2.0 None 0.0
    UndercoverClassicist 6.0 89.0 14.8
    Volcanoguy 4.0 7.0 1.8
    Wehwalt 7.5 29.0 3.9

    -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC) >>>[reply]

    Input from FA-experienced editors requested regarding quality of an existing featured article

    [edit]

    I would appreciate input at Talk:Landis's Missouri Battery#Revamping. This is one of my earliest FACs, and I would appreciate some additional thoughts to make sure I'm not being too harsh on myself; this one isn't really up to my current standard. Hog Farm Talk 04:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    On source reviews for foreign language sources

    [edit]

    Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurra-yi Khuttali/archive2 came down to three sources that were offline and in Farsi. I know that there are ways to get at offline sources, but I wonder if anyone's sitting on a way to handle spotchecks or sourcechecks when the source to be checked is in a foreign language. Folks vouched for DeepL on Hungarian sources and I think Polish sources too, but is Google Translate reliable for translating Farsi? I don't feel comfortable with skipping certain sources just because it's too hard to verify them, so these need to be checked as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This 2021 paper found that GT was 67.5% reliable for translating medical phrases into Farsi. If the sources are linguistically complicated, I would expect the reliability to be around the same; if they are linguistically simple, the reliability will go up. GT has also improved since 2021. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would assume good faith if other sources' spot-check did not indicate unverified statements or close paraphrasing. In this case, the nominator could also be requested to provide a translation. Borsoka (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Archive problem

    [edit]

    There seems to have been a problem with the bot archiving Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Corleck Head/archive1. The bot has not added Template:Fa top or Template:Fa bottom to the page or updated Talk:Corleck Head. Steelkamp (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tks, I think I've located the issue so the bot will complete the archiving process next time it runs -- FYI Hawkeye7. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. It has run now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tools to scan article for a quality check?

    [edit]

    I seem to recall there were some tools an editor could run on an article that would scan it and identify some errors, particularly with citations. The tools that I'm thinking of were more-or-less part of the FA process, I seem to recall. I'm looking for these tools (in Help:Citation tools) but cannot find them. Am I dreaming, or are there such tools? Noleander (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for December 2024

    [edit]

    Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for December 2024; thanks to Hog Farm for doing the analysis on these. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The new facstats tool has been updated with this data, but the old facstats tool has not. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply]

    Reviewers for December 2024
    # reviews Type of review
    Reviewer Content Source Image Accessibility
    Nikkimaria 2 18
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 1 14 4
    SchroCat 15 4
    Crisco 1492 9 1
    ChrisTheDude 9
    Generalissima 5 1 3
    Gog the Mild 9
    AirshipJungleman29 7
    Tim riley 7
    750h+ 5
    Aoba47 5
    UndercoverClassicist 5
    Borsoka 4
    Dudley Miles 4
    Graham Beards 4
    Hog Farm 4
    Medxvo 2 2
    Mike Christie 4
    Premeditated Chaos 2 1 1
    Serial Number 54129 3 1
    Ajpolino 2 1
    Epicgenius 3
    Heartfox 3
    Jens Lallensack 3
    Arconning 1 1
    Ceoil 2
    Edwininlondon 2
    Eewilson 1 1
    FrB.TG 2
    Hurricanehink 2
    Johnbod 2
    Lee Vilenski 2
    MaranoFan 2
    MSincccc 2
    Mujinga 2
    Phlsph7 2
    Rodney Baggins 1 1
    RoySmith 2
    Apoxyomenus 1
    AstrooKai 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1
    BennyOnTheLoose 1
    Biz 1
    Boneless Pizza! 1
    Buidhe 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1
    Casliber 1
    Choliamb 1
    David Fuchs 1
    Dreameditsbrooklyn 1
    Dugan Murphy 1
    Dxneo 1
    Dylan620 1
    Eric Idle's Cat 1
    FunkMonk 1
    Ganesha811 1
    Ian Rose 1
    Iazyges 1
    Ibjaja055 1
    Ippantekina 1
    It is a wonderful world 1
    Jon698 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1
    KJP1 1
    Lazman321 1
    Llewee 1
    MadonnaFan 1
    Matarisvan 1
    Mikenorton 1
    Nick-D 1
    Pendright 1
    Reading Beans 1
    Rjjiii 1
    Rollinginhisgrave 1
    Sawyer777 1
    Sgubaldo 1
    SounderBruce 1
    ThaesOfereode 1
    Tkbrett 1
    Trainsandotherthings 1
    Wehwalt 1
    ZKang123 1
    Totals 178 32 30
    Supports and opposes for December 2024
    # declarations Declaration
    Editor Support Oppose converted to support Struck oppose Struck support Oppose None Total
    Nikkimaria 1 19 20
    SchroCat 9 4 6 19
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 1 18 19
    Crisco 1492 9 1 10
    ChrisTheDude 7 2 9
    Generalissima 5 4 9
    Gog the Mild 5 3 1 9
    Tim riley 7 7
    AirshipJungleman29 3 1 3 7
    Aoba47 3 1 1 5
    750h+ 5 5
    UndercoverClassicist 3 1 1 5
    Graham Beards 3 1 4
    Mike Christie 1 1 2 4
    Hog Farm 3 1 4
    Serial Number 54129 4 4
    Medxvo 2 2 4
    Premeditated Chaos 2 2 4
    Dudley Miles 4 4
    Borsoka 3 1 4
    Epicgenius 3 3
    Jens Lallensack 1 2 3
    Heartfox 3 3
    Ajpolino 2 1 3
    Phlsph7 2 2
    Lee Vilenski 2 2
    Arconning 2 2
    FrB.TG 1 1 2
    Johnbod 1 1 2
    MaranoFan 1 1 2
    Eewilson 1 1 2
    RoySmith 2 2
    Mujinga 1 1 2
    Hurricanehink 2 2
    Rodney Baggins 1 1 2
    Edwininlondon 1 1 2
    MSincccc 1 1 2
    Ceoil 2 2
    Rjjiii 1 1
    Nick-D 1 1
    Buidhe 1 1
    MadonnaFan 1 1
    Eric Idle's Cat 1 1
    KJP1 1 1
    Dreameditsbrooklyn 1 1
    Reading Beans 1 1
    Boneless Pizza! 1 1
    It is a wonderful world 1 1
    Ippantekina 1 1
    Sgubaldo 1 1
    Lazman321 1 1
    Pendright 1 1
    SounderBruce 1 1
    Jon698 1 1
    Rollinginhisgrave 1 1
    Iazyges 1 1
    Apoxyomenus 1 1
    David Fuchs 1 1
    Trainsandotherthings 1 1
    Ibjaja055 1 1
    Matarisvan 1 1
    Dylan620 1 1
    Ganesha811 1 1
    ThaesOfereode 1 1
    Sawyer777 1 1
    Ian Rose 1 1
    Wehwalt 1 1
    Choliamb 1 1
    Biz 1 1
    BennyOnTheLoose 1 1
    Tkbrett 1 1
    ZKang123 1 1
    Kavyansh.Singh 1 1
    Dugan Murphy 1 1
    Llewee 1 1
    Dxneo 1 1
    Casliber 1 1
    Mikenorton 1 1
    AstrooKai 1 1
    FunkMonk 1 1
    Caeciliusinhorto 1 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1 1
    Totals 121 1 23 95 240

    The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply]

    Nominators for October 2024 to December 2024 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months
    Nominations (12 mos) Reviews (12 mos) Ratio (12 mos)
    750h+ 7.0 56.0 8.0
    AirshipJungleman29 7.0 46.0 6.6
    Amir Ghandi 3.0 None 0.0
    BernaBotto 2.0 None 0.0
    Boneless Pizza! 2.5 9.0 3.6
    Chrishm21 2.0 None 0.0
    ChrisTheDude 9.0 71.0 7.9
    Crisco 1492 2.0 25.0 12.5
    Darkwarriorblake 6.0 3.0 0.5
    Dudley Miles 6.0 33.0 5.5
    Dugan Murphy 3.0 13.0 4.3
    Dxneo 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Eem dik doun in toene 3.0 10.0 3.3
    Epicgenius 8.5 20.0 2.4
    Eric Idle's Cat 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Ganesha811 3.0 2.0 0.7
    Generalissima 10.0 70.0 7.0
    Gog the Mild 2.0 82.0 41.0
    Hawkeye7 5.0 6.0 1.2
    Heartfox 5.0 28.0 5.6
    Hog Farm 7.0 53.0 7.6
    Hurricanehink 2.5 20.0 8.0
    Ippantekina 6.0 7.0 1.2
    Jenhawk777 2.0 3.0 1.5
    Jens Lallensack 2.3 29.0 12.4
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 6.0 228.0 38.0
    Joeyquism 3.0 17.0 5.7
    Kyle Peake 4.0 None 0.0
    Lee Vilenski 4.0 4.0 1.0
    Llewee 2.0 8.0 4.0
    M4V3R1CK32 2.0 None 0.0
    MaranoFan 5.0 14.0 2.8
    Mike Christie 6.0 55.0 9.2
    NegativeMP1 3.0 11.0 3.7
    Noorullah21 4.0 None 0.0
    Peacemaker67 6.0 2.0 0.3
    Phlsph7 5.0 18.0 3.6
    Pollosito 2.0 None 0.0
    Premeditated Chaos 9.3 38.0 4.1
    PSA 3.0 4.0 1.3
    Relayed 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Royiswariii 2.0 None 0.0
    Sammi Brie 3.0 12.0 4.0
    SchroCat 16.5 169.0 10.2
    The Green Star Collector 3.0 None 0.0
    Thebiguglyalien 5.0 3.0 0.6
    Thuiop 2.0 1.0 0.5
    UndercoverClassicist 7.0 92.0 13.1
    Volcanoguy 5.0 7.0 1.4
    Wehwalt 7.5 26.0 3.5
    XR228 2.0 None 0.0
    ZKang123 5.0 12.0 2.4

    One interesting statistical note: the annual overall oppose percentage (number of opposes divided by the sum of opposes and supports) is 13% for 2024; that's higher than for any year in the last eleven years. It's only once been over 9% since 2014. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Maybe the exhortations to oppose more are beginning to work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Automatic lapsing of FA status?

    [edit]

    See this proposal and surrounding discussions. Serial (speculates here) 14:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    "only one nomination at a time"

    [edit]

    The current WP:FAC header says "An editor is allowed to be the sole nominator of only one article at a time". This is not correct - two are allowed if the first is well on its way to promotion. I think it would be a good idea to change that to something similar to what WP:FLC says, for example "An editor should only add a second nomination with the approval of the coordinators after the first has gained significant support." ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC) pinging @FAC coordinators: as they should probably make any change. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Bizarre to ping the co-ords on what is the main FA discussion page. Serial (speculates here) 16:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, good spot. Go for it. Serial (speculates here) 14:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Citing abstracts

    [edit]

    Is there any clear policy on citing a scientific paper when only the abstract is available? And of course by available I mean "on line for free". Given the deplorable state of the scientific publishing industry, a lot of scientific papers are behind paywalls. We get access to some materials via WP:TWL (in my opinion, the most valuable thing WMF has ever done to help editors), but there's still a lot that's locked away and not surprisingly, people cite what's freely available. It seems to be widely accepted that citing abstracts in sub-optimal.[2][3][4][5][6] but I can't find anything our own policies (WP:CITE, etc) which addresses this. RoySmith (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Interesting Signpost article on that, although old. You're right that it should probably be codified as poor practice though, to save arguments on individual project/pages. Serial (speculates here) 17:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @RoySmith: by the way, tangential to this, but I can send you the "Echolocation signals of dusky dolphins" article if you'd like? Serial (speculates here) 18:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, please. Much appreciated. RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Emailed you. Serial (speculates here) 20:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We have WP:PAYWALL, which says that the fact an article is not available online for free is not a reason to reject it as a source. There's WP:HEADLINE, which says that headlines are not reliable sources. Obviously an abstract is not a headline and the issues which make a headline unreliable don't apply to quite the same extent, but I would say that it still applies at least partially in spirit: like a headline, an abstract may lack the detail/nuance of the main article and there's never any reason to cite it ahead of the article apart from accessibility. For most of our articles for uncontentious claims that's probably okay, but at FA level I would be asking why not cite the actual article. (While I cannot find any policy specifically discussing abstracts, it has been discussed before e.g. at WP:RSN: [7], [8]) Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, and further, I'd argue that WP:FA? #1C (the requirement that sources must be 'high quality') almost automatically precludes using what is by definition an abridgement of a source.
    And we do have WP:RX (and me!) for those particularly hard-to-find morsels  :) Serial (speculates here) 20:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    FAC reviewing statistics and nominator reviewing table for January 2025

    [edit]

    Here are the FAC reviewing statistics for January 2025. The tables below include all reviews for FACS that were either archived or promoted last month, so the reviews included are spread over the last two or three months. A review posted last month is not included if the FAC was still open at the end of the month. The new facstats tool has been updated with this data, but the old facstats tool has not. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply]

    Reviewers for January 2025
    # reviews Type of review
    Reviewer Content Source Image Accessibility
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 24 13
    Nikkimaria 1 15
    SchroCat 9 6
    Crisco 1492 9 1 4
    Aoba47 11 2
    Generalissima 9 2
    Mike Christie 10
    UndercoverClassicist 9 1
    Z1720 9
    Tim riley 8
    ChrisTheDude 7
    Hog Farm 6 1
    Medxvo 5 2
    History6042 6
    MSincccc 6
    Matarisvan 5
    750h+ 4
    Boneless Pizza! 4
    Borsoka 4
    Gog the Mild 3 1
    MaranoFan 3 1
    Premeditated Chaos 3 1
    Serial Number 54129 3 1
    Dudley Miles 3
    Graham Beards 3
    Heartfox 3
    Hurricanehink 3
    Ippantekina 3
    LunaEclipse 1 2
    NegativeMP1 3
    AirshipJungleman29 2
    Arcticocean 2
    Brachy0008 2
    CatchMe 2
    Cplakidas 2
    DoctorWhoFan91 1 1
    Epicgenius 2
    Iazyges 2
    ImaginesTigers 2
    Jens Lallensack 2
    Paleface Jack 2
    Phlsph7 2
    TheAstorPastor 2
    TompaDompa 2
    Vacant0 2
    1989 1
    Alexeyevitch 1
    AryKun 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1
    Casliber 1
    Choliamb 1
    David Fuchs 1
    Departure– 1
    Draken Bowser 1
    Dylan620 1
    Edwininlondon 1
    EF5 1
    Fathoms Below 1
    FrB.TG 1
    FunkMonk 1
    Ganesha811 1
    Gerda Arendt 1
    Hawkeye7 1
    Johnbod 1
    Jon698 1
    Kusma 1
    Lazman321 1
    Lee Vilenski 1
    LEvalyn 1
    LittleJerry 1
    Marchjuly 1
    Mujinga 1
    Panini! 1
    Patrick Welsh 1
    Pokelego999 1
    Popcornfud 1
    Red Phoenix 1
    RFNirmala 1
    Rjjiii 1
    RoySmith 1
    Seefooddiet 1
    Shapeyness 1
    Sir MemeGod mobile 1
    SNUGGUMS 1
    Steelkamp 1
    Thebiguglyalien 1
    TheDoctorWho 1
    Tintor2 1
    TrademarkedTWOrantula 1
    Traumnovelle 1
    XR228 1
    ZKang123 1
    Totals 223 43 41
    Supports and opposes for January 2025
    # declarations Declaration
    Editor Support Oppose converted to support Struck oppose Struck support Oppose None Total
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 37 37
    Nikkimaria 16 16
    SchroCat 6 2 7 15
    Crisco 1492 9 5 14
    Aoba47 8 5 13
    Generalissima 9 2 11
    Mike Christie 7 1 1 1 10
    UndercoverClassicist 5 5 10
    Z1720 9 9
    Tim riley 8 8
    Hog Farm 4 1 2 7
    ChrisTheDude 6 1 7
    Medxvo 5 2 7
    History6042 4 1 1 6
    MSincccc 5 1 6
    Matarisvan 5 5
    Premeditated Chaos 3 1 4
    750h+ 4 4
    MaranoFan 3 1 4
    Boneless Pizza! 4 4
    Serial Number 54129 2 1 1 4
    Borsoka 3 1 4
    Gog the Mild 3 1 4
    Dudley Miles 3 3
    Heartfox 2 1 3
    NegativeMP1 2 1 3
    Ippantekina 3 3
    Hurricanehink 2 1 3
    LunaEclipse 2 1 3
    Graham Beards 1 2 3
    Paleface Jack 2 2
    ImaginesTigers 2 2
    Phlsph7 2 2
    Iazyges 2 2
    DoctorWhoFan91 1 1 2
    AirshipJungleman29 2 2
    Epicgenius 1 1 2
    Arcticocean 2 2
    Vacant0 2 2
    Cplakidas 2 2
    CatchMe 2 2
    TheAstorPastor 2 2
    TompaDompa 1 1 2
    Jens Lallensack 1 1 2
    Brachy0008 1 1 2
    Edwininlondon 1 1
    TrademarkedTWOrantula 1 1
    LEvalyn 1 1
    Panini! 1 1
    Johnbod 1 1
    FunkMonk 1 1
    Thebiguglyalien 1 1
    Red Phoenix 1 1
    Traumnovelle 1 1
    Seefooddiet 1 1
    Sir MemeGod mobile 1 1
    Shapeyness 1 1
    Averageuntitleduser 1 1
    Casliber 1 1
    Jon698 1 1
    Draken Bowser 1 1
    Choliamb 1 1
    Steelkamp 1 1
    Lazman321 1 1
    1989 1 1
    Fathoms Below 1 1
    Popcornfud 1 1
    Alexeyevitch 1 1
    Marchjuly 1 1
    EF5 1 1
    Pokelego999 1 1
    AryKun 1 1
    Lee Vilenski 1 1
    Kusma 1 1
    Patrick Welsh 1 1
    TheDoctorWho 1 1
    LittleJerry 1 1
    Hawkeye7 1 1
    Gerda Arendt 1 1
    Rjjiii 1 1
    Ganesha811 1 1
    Tintor2 1 1
    David Fuchs 1 1
    FrB.TG 1 1
    Dylan620 1 1
    ZKang123 1 1
    RFNirmala 1 1
    RoySmith 1 1
    SNUGGUMS 1 1
    Departure– 1 1
    Mujinga 1 1
    XR228 1 1
    Totals 173 1 2 14 117 307

    The following table shows the 12-month review-to-nominations ratio for everyone who nominated an article that was promoted or archived in the last three months who has nominated more than one article in the last 12 months. The average promoted FAC receives between 6 and 7 reviews. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply]

    Nominators for November 2024 to January 2025 with more than one nomination in the last 12 months
    Nominations (12 mos) Reviews (12 mos) Ratio (12 mos)
    750h+ 8.0 60.0 7.5
    AirshipJungleman29 8.0 41.0 5.1
    Amir Ghandi 3.0 None 0.0
    Aoba47 3.0 51.0 17.0
    AssociateAffiliate 3.0 None 0.0
    BernaBotto 2.0 None 0.0
    Boneless Pizza! 3.0 13.0 4.3
    Chrishm21 2.0 None 0.0
    ChrisTheDude 10.0 69.0 6.9
    Crisco 1492 3.0 39.0 13.0
    Darkwarriorblake 5.0 3.0 0.6
    Dugan Murphy 3.0 13.0 4.3
    Dxneo 2.0 1.0 0.5
    EF5 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Eiga-Kevin2 2.0 None 0.0
    Epicgenius 8.5 21.0 2.5
    Eric Idle's Cat 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Ganesha811 3.0 3.0 1.0
    Generalissima 9.0 78.0 8.7
    Gog the Mild 4.0 78.0 19.5
    Hawkeye7 6.0 6.0 1.0
    Heartfox 6.0 29.0 4.8
    Hog Farm 8.0 56.0 7.0
    Hurricanehink 2.5 21.0 8.4
    Ippantekina 7.0 8.0 1.1
    Jenhawk777 2.0 3.0 1.5
    Jo-Jo Eumerus 5.0 241.0 48.2
    Lee Vilenski 3.0 5.0 1.7
    Lisha2037 2.0 None 0.0
    Llewee 3.0 8.0 2.7
    M4V3R1CK32 3.0 None 0.0
    MaranoFan 6.0 15.0 2.5
    Mike Christie 7.0 63.0 9.0
    NegativeMP1 3.0 12.0 4.0
    Noorullah21 4.0 None 0.0
    PanagiotisZois 2.0 3.0 1.5
    Peacemaker67 5.0 1.0 0.2
    Phlsph7 5.0 19.0 3.8
    Premeditated Chaos 9.3 42.0 4.5
    PSA 3.0 4.0 1.3
    Relayed 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Royiswariii 3.0 None 0.0
    SchroCat 16.5 170.0 10.3
    Skyshifter 4.0 6.0 1.5
    The Green Star Collector 3.0 None 0.0
    Thuiop 2.0 1.0 0.5
    UndercoverClassicist 7.0 95.0 13.6
    Vacant0 2.0 17.0 8.5
    Volcanoguy 5.0 7.0 1.4
    XR228 2.0 1.0 0.5
    Z1720 2.0 19.0 9.5
    ZKang123 4.0 12.0 3.0

    -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]