Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
It appears that consensus has been reached to use the cropped version of Option 1, as given by TansoShoshen. Accordingly, the option has been selected.
I believe we should use Option 1 instead of Option 2, since the latter seems to be of much lower quality than the first. I didn't wanna edit war so I am thus beginning this discussion. Furthermore, I think that the Cropped version given by TansoShoshen is ideal. EarthDude (talk) 09:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This third one by Fylindfotberserk appears comparatively better among all three in terms of area of exposure and contrast between cloth and skin. Riteze (talk) 23:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Option 1 Better in quality and I see no issues about it. Not sure why there's this image issue now when option 1 was the infobox image for a bit of time without fuss. I'm strongly opposed to the third option as it's not an official portrait. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's more of following a precedent, especially when the subject is no longer in office and/or is deceased. Look at Obama, Clinton, Bushes, Reagan, Carter, Blair, Gordon Brown, Cameron, Lula, etc. If an official portrait is available and in good quality, we should use it over candid pics. This I think is also in the case when the subject is deceased since the argument of "using a recent picture" would no longer apply as for deceased celebrities/politicians/athletes, etc. the images used on their IB's are pics depicting them either younger, in their prime (in this case while they held office) or a black and white pick. I think for Singh's case, it makes sense to use an official portrait since it's in good quality, follows precedent with other wiki articles that have official portraits available and I honestly don't see the issue in using either official portrait (1 or 2), however I have a preference for 1 due to quality. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You should choose option1 as to my mind from Indian perspective, option does not do the justice to his serious and no-nonsensical personality. Mayla23 (talk) 14:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Both the photos have been used in official pages. While Option 1 appears as an official portrait of the PM[1] the latter appears also on the page managed by the Prime Minister's office. Both photos are during Dr. Manmohan's term as Prime Minister of India, his most significant accomplishment. The choice then rests with which is the better image per se. While many hear have argued for Option 1, because it has a higher resolution, it is also a fact that at the size it will portrayed in Wikipedia, Option 1 is much darker. Option 2, shows the whole face much more clear. So my vote is for Option 2. Rigorousmortal (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Option 1, the cropped version which TansoShoshen commented, is the best image. The face is straight looking at the photographer and the contrast is good. TarnishedPathtalk08:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: no evidence provided. It shall remain re-elected until further evidence is provided. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 02:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Option 1
Option 2
.jpg)