Talk:San people
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the San people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
![]() | San people was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
Should the name be changed to "Bushmen"?
[edit]In the first chapter of Small Places, Large Issues, Eriksen notes, albeit parenthetically:
(By the way, the Bushmen are sometimes spoken of as the San, since the term Bushmen is by some considered vaguely racist. However, since ‘San’ is a pejorative term used by the neighbouring Khoikhoi, the term Bushmen is again in common use; see Barnard 2007.)
What is the current rationale for keeping the article's current name? Regards, Lunaroxas (talk) 23:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Take a look at the archives. This has been discussed numerous times in the past. Greenman (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Monogamy
[edit]User:Greenman please explain why you prefer a random and inaccessible website to an Oxford University Press book. Will you revert me also if I add Human Relations Area Files as a source, which I intended to do? Doug Weller talk 10:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Did you not notice it is a travel site selling tours?[1]. Doug Weller talk 11:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Doug Weller: Apologies, I seem to have got things mixed up, perhaps because your edit was made at the same time as mine. I've restored your source, but the text appeared incomplete. If your edit intended to say that "95% of San are monogamous", it should be clear the date that this refers to, so for now I've left it as 'most'. Greenman (talk) 13:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Greenman No problem now. I'll look at it tomorrow, too busy today. Doug Weller talk 14:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Doug Weller: Apologies, I seem to have got things mixed up, perhaps because your edit was made at the same time as mine. I've restored your source, but the text appeared incomplete. If your edit intended to say that "95% of San are monogamous", it should be clear the date that this refers to, so for now I've left it as 'most'. Greenman (talk) 13:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia requested maps in Africa
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Africa articles
- Top-importance Africa articles
- B-Class Angola articles
- Top-importance Angola articles
- WikiProject Angola articles
- B-Class Botswana articles
- Top-importance Botswana articles
- WikiProject Botswana articles
- B-Class Namibia articles
- Top-importance Namibia articles
- WikiProject Namibia articles
- B-Class South Africa articles
- Top-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- B-Class Ethnic groups articles
- High-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- High-importance South Africa articles
- B-Class PSP SA articles
- Unknown-importance PSP SA articles
- Wikipedia Primary School articles